Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29

Thread: Transmission gearing questions

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mississippi Gulf Coast and Central Florida
    Posts
    2,153

    Transmission gearing questions

    OK guys and gals, so after the cruise on Saturday I was picking Butch's brain on rear-end gear ratios and transmission options. He suggested the close ratio toploader with either 3.31 or 3.54 rear gears. I had been thinking that the wide ratio box with a 3.08 gear would be a better option, and here's why.

    If you run the numbers with a gearing calculator (I used the SecondStrike version), it appears that first and second gear with the wide box and 3.08 rear would perform almost exactly the same as the close box with the 3.54 rear, i.e. the overall ratio (end to end) for first/second gears is 8.56/5.94 and 8.24/6.00 for the wide/3.08 and close/3.54 respectively (interestingly, first gear in the wide/3.08 combo, 8.56, is lower than first in the close/3.54 combo, 8.24!).

    Next, if you look at third and forth, third in the wide/3.08 setup is identical to a close ratio box with the 3.31 gear set, while fourth is equivalent to the rear end ratio in each of the setups, since it is a one-to-one ratio in the tranny. This gives a little lower cruise rpm for the 3.08 over the 3.31, and even more difference in rpm over the 3.54 gear set.

    The engines you all are running are more than capable of pulling in any of these combinations, as I witnessed (quite impressively) over this last weekend. I plan to run either the 408 Windsor or the 427FE engine, so no problem here with torque/power. The only issue I could see is that the split between second and third or third and fourth might be a bit tall for the wide box, but it doesn't seem that large from the numbers at 1.42 and 1,36 for the wide box versus 1.36 and 1.29 for the close box.

    So is there any flaw in this logic? I realize that this is more of a clinical approach rather than the seat of the pants feel needed to really make a good choice. However, you can't just go and drive a bunch of Cobras of all different combinations to help you make a choice. Besides, it's the engineer in me that wants to see the numbers.

    Additionally, I found a potential replacement for my lost toploader, and I suspect it is for a small block application... price is right and right now I can't be choosey. Let me know what you think. Is this too much of a compromise?
    Last edited by Slither; May 16th, 2006 at 11:14 PM.
    Paul

    289 USRRC
    1964 289 5-bolt block
    Toploader and 3.31 rear

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    , Indiana, USA.
    Posts
    1,316
    Quote:
    "However, you can't just go and drive a bunch of Cobras of all different combinations to help you make a choice. Besides, it's the engineer in me that wants to see the numbers."

    If you can't drive every Cobra with every combination then you should listen to someone that has driven every Cobra with every combination.

    It would be even better if that person had not only driven every Cobra with every combination but also built transmissions and rear ends every day for a living.

    Butch Capps!

    As far as cars go, in the battle of clinical vs. experience I would always lean toward experience.
    Brent
    "Build em' light and wind em' tight!"
    www.cardomain.com/ride/2660122
    www.cardomain.com/ride/2659961

    Sold Unique 427SC
    #4279401

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Port Charlotte,Florida
    Posts
    68
    paul,

    i will second the comment brent made.....listen to mr. capps.....

    chris

    brent...if you see this i am sending you a p.m.........gots a question for ya...
    "Why built it if you are not going to beat on it ??"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    W. Suffield, Ct., USA.
    Posts
    423
    paul, butch`s advise is right on ( it always is). imo, if youre going to run posi go with the 3.54, if youre going with an open rear the 3.31 would give you a little better traction with only half the rubber having power put to it. any higher ratio than that, youll never see anything near the top end of that combo cause the front end will have too much high speed lift before you get there (unless you have a death wish). i went with the 3.31/ posi / cr trans and wish i had gone with the 3.54 instead. later, freakin`brian

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mississippi Gulf Coast and Central Florida
    Posts
    2,153
    Right, great answers, but to the wrong question. Butch has a world of experience... thats why I was discussing it with him. I just could not tap into all of that experience in such a short period of time. In our discussion, we did not have time to cover all of the subtleties and nuances of different combinations. He did not say this was a bad combo (maybe he was just being polite). As you know, he is a busy man and I don't want to keep bothering him (maybe every once in a while). And collectively, you all have good experience, as well.

    I asked David Kee about it and he said it is a great combo, and that there is a 428FE/wide ratio topoader car there in San Antonio that is delightful to drive.

    Rick mentioned trying a 3.54, so I wonder why, and if a 3.54 with effectively a taller 3rd and 4th would be advantageous or not... pros and cons.

    Chris, I thought you said you have a 5-speed??? - which I understand is a wide ratio box. What rear gearing, and would you rather have something different, and why?

    Brent, you mentioned doing a taller rear gear if you were to do it ever again... so...?

    Thanks!
    Last edited by Slither; May 17th, 2006 at 09:56 AM.
    Paul

    289 USRRC
    1964 289 5-bolt block
    Toploader and 3.31 rear

  6. #6

    When?

    Paul:

    When are you getting your car? Have you ordered it already? I know you wrote me some e-mail middle of last year during my build and I got the impression you already had ordered yours.

    What did you finally decide to order from Unique? When will you be driving it?

    Juan

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Pearland, TX, USA.
    Posts
    402
    Paul,

    My car has a TKO 600 w/ .64 OD and 3.54 axle ratio. If you go with the small block I do not think I would go taller than a 3:54. A BB car, maybe the 3:31. Both Chris and I have a 5 speed trans, and if you are going to be on the highway that may be the best way to go.

    Justin

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Shepherdsville, KY, USA.
    Posts
    1,725

    Exclamation Just think about it

    David Kee as far as I know has never owned a Cobra in his life time.....

    He is a Drag Racer and not a Road Race Man..........

    He gave me the same advice about the wide ratio TL 5 years ago.

    For the 427 with the torque and cubes the close ratio in my opinion is the ticket, on the road the 3:31 with the Auburn Unit works well, I would like to have a 3:54 in it for one day for comparision. I may still do that one day, cant advise because I havnt been there.

    In Juan's car, 302. 355 HP, open rear end, 3:54 with close ratio top loader, I love it. Don't know how it could be better!

    Many variables here, and a lot of opinions, just like clothes and pick-up trucks, personal preference rules.
    Rick
    427 S/C , 427 Side-oiler, 4 Speed Close Ratio Top Loader, 3:73 Gear
    #4279405

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Port Charlotte,Florida
    Posts
    68
    paul....

    you are making this waayyyyyy more complicated than it needs to be....
    only 2 questions need answered...
    1- how much freeway running will you honestly do ??
    2- what rpm can you live with going down the freeway ??
    not much freeway..go with a toploader...
    are you honestly going to climb in the cobra and do 700 plus miles like i
    did on wed and sunday ?? if so then go for the overdrive(.64).

    as for gear spreads....who cares ??? you are talking about a 2400lb car
    with most guys running 400+ ftlbs of torque. the drop off between gears
    is not a issue. ask brent how much mine drops off from the first(3.27)
    to second (2.20?) shift..not enough to even notice.

    as for diff ratios,
    3.54+bfg 295/50/15 is identical to
    3.73+quick time 295/50/15
    the hoosiers are roughly 2" taller.

    i have driven a unique with a 408/tremec/3.31 posi,does it pull hard ??
    yep...does it pull as hard as mine...nope. is it a great driving car ??
    yes. all the combos will work great...just be honest about what you
    intend to do with it....

    chris
    "Why built it if you are not going to beat on it ??"

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    , Indiana, USA.
    Posts
    1,316

    Talking

    I had a chance to ride with Chris and the only problem with his car is it misses ALL THE TIME.

    OOOHHHHHH wait, that was the rev limiter. (-:

    Way too much fun!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Brent
    "Build em' light and wind em' tight!"
    www.cardomain.com/ride/2660122
    www.cardomain.com/ride/2659961

    Sold Unique 427SC
    #4279401

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Prince Frederick, Maryland, USA.
    Posts
    1,561
    Paul,
    I am running 427FE with CLose ratio Toploader 295/50/15 3.31 posi.
    Right now with 4000 miles I wish I had a shorter gear. An all around gear of 3.54 but I am leaning toward a 3.77.
    I am driving to Carlise tomorrow and will know if I like the combo I have on a 200 mile oneway Highway trip.
    Around my back road area I wind up leaving it in 3rd at 50mph. It could be me I just would like more gear.

    Maybe a 3.31 with a TKO600/.81
    Tony
    Unique 427 #4279480 Precision Engine Machine Company 427 s/o 483.47 stroker close ratio toploader 3.31 jag rear

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Cincy, OH, USA.
    Posts
    376
    Paul, I run a 3:54/1 toploader 428 and love the combination. Intense acceleration and good topend. I picked this combination with the help of Butch Capps. This setup will run 140mph est. (I have only had it to 120) and it scares the crap out of you, I don't want more topend just the ride up to that. My two cents
    Scott
    4279454
    SA 428
    3:54

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mississippi Gulf Coast and Central Florida
    Posts
    2,153
    Juan: I have a car on order and had planned to get it this summer... before the storm put a wrench in my gears. I really don't know when it will come to fruition. However, I remain hopeful against the odds.
    Paul

    289 USRRC
    1964 289 5-bolt block
    Toploader and 3.31 rear

  14. #14

    Your Unique

    Hope you get it soon, you will not regret it.

    Juan

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    paso robles Ca.
    Posts
    249
    don't forget to determine your motors rpm needs. my small block needs to run around 3500 rpm any less and it loads up and starts running like sh**.i didn't consider this when i chose the tremec 5-speed ,now i can't use 5th gear unless i'm going in the mid eighties or faster. now my only choice is a rear end gear change or a cam change

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mississippi Gulf Coast and Central Florida
    Posts
    2,153
    Justin:

    While it is not the exact same thing, I was considering the stroked Windsor to be effectively a big block, since it has similar displacement and performance characteristics... so it seems it would be a wash between the two (fire-breathing big blocks not withstanding).
    Paul

    289 USRRC
    1964 289 5-bolt block
    Toploader and 3.31 rear

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mississippi Gulf Coast and Central Florida
    Posts
    2,153
    Thanks for the clarification Rick. Let me ask you this. Just for discussion sake, what if you could have your close/3.31 setup with fourth gear a shade taller... say .93... how would that change your opinion of drivability or would it not make a difference?

    Anyone else that has this combination could comment, too.
    Paul

    289 USRRC
    1964 289 5-bolt block
    Toploader and 3.31 rear

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Pearland, TX, USA.
    Posts
    402
    Scott h

    What are the specs on your motor?

    Chris,

    At what RPM do you shift your car into 5th gear?

    Justin

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    paso robles Ca.
    Posts
    249
    i have a dutton perf. 351 W. comp cam part #35-250-4, edelbrock perf headsvictor jr intake with holley hp 650 CFM. engine dyno'd at 410 HP at 5800 rpm and 371 torque, at 3800 rpm's its 243 hp and 335 torque. when shifting into 5th rpms drop to around 2500 at about 75mph. these are ball park figures since i have not used 5th since last fall. its raining right now so i cant go driving but i think i need to make a couple of runs to get some accurate numbers. i was not aware of all the different factors involved when i picked my set-up

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Port Charlotte,Florida
    Posts
    68
    justin,

    most of the time it is around 3200-3500,about 70-80 on the interstate.
    i put about 100 miles on it last nite terrorizing the local populace
    and never used 5th. 1st thru 4th are great gears for around town and
    fifth is for the interstate.

    scott...

    by chance do you have 3.31 gears ???? a change to 3.54/3.73 makes a pretty
    good difference. going from 3.54 to 3.73 with a 88" circumfrence tire brought
    my rpms up just enough to get me out of the lumpiness of my cam. i actually
    wish i had put 3.91's in the diff,but i had already bought my auburn pro(you
    change carriers from 3.73 to 3.91). one other thing to try is to bring the
    front jets down a size or two. you can then increase the secondary jets to
    compensate to keep your a/f good. since low throttle/low rpm generally
    is the primary side of the carb you might be able to keep it from loading up...

    also i see you are running a hp series carb. i have a 950hp and i found that
    the idle air bleeds were to small in mine. what this causes is when you adjust
    your idle mixture screws you will have a very limited adjustment range. i
    would go from really lean to blubbering rich on my carb in less than a 1/8
    of a turn. really hard to set it with that amount of travel........

    but i beg of you...please read the tech articles on holleys site about air
    bleeds and how they function before changing anything......you can get in
    trouble really quick....

    chris
    p.s.-i pulled your cam card up,it is a fairly hot cam but you should be able to
    clean up the running problem with some carb tuning....
    "Why built it if you are not going to beat on it ??"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •