Results 1 to 20 of 31

Thread: what's in a name?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Ridgecrest, CA, USA.
    Posts
    246

    what's in a name?

    I suggest that we look at the name of this website and then take a look a what's going on with the FFR website. Shelbys got his lawyers busy again. It might be worth it to all of us to remove "Cobra" from our site.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Seattle, WA, USA.
    Posts
    1,083
    I have thought about this. We are small and I hope under the radar of Ford and Shelby. I'm open to ideas and to what the domain name should be.

    If a lawer told me to take the site down or be sued, the site will come down.
    Patrick Brown
    Forum Administrator



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Katy, TX
    Posts
    31
    For that matter, might be a good idea to check the metatags, as those are one component of the lawsuit. The banner at the top also contains designations that might cause some trouble.

    "uniqueroadsters" might be a candidate.

    good gosh a mighty....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mississippi Gulf Coast and Central Florida
    Posts
    2,155

    Thumbs down

    Bummer that he feels the need to stir the pot so many times over. He is only hurting his own reputation. I hope he gets chased out of the courtroom by the judge...

    I thought that the Weavers had taken care of this once and for all, during a previous bout with him. I thought I heard that the judge told them not to try anything ever again in that jurisdiction.

    Weavers can you comment?
    Paul

    289 USRRC
    1964 289 5-bolt block
    Toploader and 3.31 rear

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mississippi Gulf Coast and Central Florida
    Posts
    2,155

    Thumbs up

    Patrick,

    How about just changing the domain name from uniquecobra to uniquemotorcarsforum, in order to ward off the potential issue?
    Paul

    289 USRRC
    1964 289 5-bolt block
    Toploader and 3.31 rear

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Clinton, TN, USA.
    Posts
    1,287
    I think the issue turns on the manufactuers of the Replicar kits and how they advertise their products. Now that Superperformance owns AC and have partnered with Ole' Shel they are making a concerted effort to wipe out competition to increase profitability. Now is perhaps a good time from their business perspective to do that as the disposable income available for such products is been reduced dramatically due to the current economic conditions. (Failure of Kit Car magaine is the most visible example that comes to my mind.) Thus the competitors of SuperPerformance are weakened and the marginal players will forego court challenges and cease to operate or settle.

    As for our site name I would hate to see it changed, as we are not manufactuers. As we all are well aware Unique Motorcars has been dilligent is not using the cobra name or being associated with it and I would not like to see any spill over from our tying the two names together in our URL compromising their position.

    I like Paul's suggestion. Again however the meta tags are an issue as for folks to find the site they type in what they specifically are interested in the search box of the web browser that they use. There are other Unique sites out there, but none other than ours that our specific to our kind of replicar.

    So it is a conundrum as to how to name the site -- being specific to the manufactuer, as our cars are not ERA or FFR or Backdraft or Superperformance... they are Unique and have specific differences from those of other manufactuers. We are also interested, from a community of interest perspective, to introduce and meet others interested in the hobby (meta tag issue) and specifically the body style we like.

    Maybe we need to have some private discussions on this topic.

    Ralph
    Last edited by ralphscott; January 22nd, 2009 at 04:04 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Roseville, Ca., USA.
    Posts
    523
    Just read some of the complaint that was filed at the FFR site and was suprised (or not) to see that Shelby has registered trademarks for the word "289" as well as "427 SC" among the others. Much of the complaint deals with the fact that FFCobra.com has advertizing and sales availiable on the site. We'll see how all this pans out I'm sure.
    Rod
    Roseville, Ca.
    289 FIA #9152 "The Flintstone Cobra"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Ridgecrest, CA, USA.
    Posts
    246
    I wonder how the Studebaker/Avanti folks feel about "289" being a registered trade mark for Shelby???? Don't try to apply logic to Shelby's actions....it won't work. I think we need to get "cobra" out of our domain name and I thnink we need to discuss the issue in an open forum as opposed to in private. I'm fed up with SAAC for their closed door policy and I've been fed up with Shelby (the man) for abou 35 years.

    Phil Souza

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Heflin, Alabama, USA.
    Posts
    391

    I wondered...

    I wondered who else had read through the manifesto and seen that about "289."

    I'd love to see 1) Chrysler lay the smack down, stating that they own the rights to the word "Daytona" in all automotive respects, or 2) the France family do the same thing. Did shelby have THEIR permission to use the name of THEIR race track and profit from the association thereof?

    But, I agree with the posts above - I like Paul's suggestion of uniquemotorcarsforum.com.
    Zach Butterworth
    289 FIA #9367

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •