Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Performance difference between 351W & SA 354 stkr?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
    Posts
    100

    Performance difference between 351W & SA 354 stkr?

    I've wondered this for awhile. How would a 351W's performance compare to a 302W stroked to 354 (Southern Automotive's kit), assuming similar heads, intake, carb, etc? Would there be a significant difference? Would the stroker make more torque? Which has more potential? Why would one choose one versus the other?

    Robert

    Unique Motorcars 289 F.I.A. # 9142
    Southern Automotive 354 stroker

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
    Posts
    106
    Robert, I think the stroker motor will make initially more torque[read lower end of rpm range] Though nothin makes up for cubic inches in displacement in the long run. Why not stroke the 351 withan eagle kit out to 406....then we're havin fun[:P]

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Dacula, GA, USA.
    Posts
    450
    351 stroked to 427. That's the ticket.

    427SC, Torch Red / white stripes
    427 Windsor Stroker from Southern Automotive
    Delicious example of Beauty + Power.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Gadsden, Al , USA.
    Posts
    1,543
    We had Bill at Southern Automotive build us a 347 stroker for our 289 demo and we were amazed at the power and torque, it is almost as fast as our 427 demo with the Ernie Elliott Nascar motor. I would love to run it at TGP and compare numbers with the Nascar cobra.

    Alan

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
    Posts
    100
    Stroking the 351 seems to be the popular answer I've been getting. Of course a 4xx c.i. motor has more potential. But what I'm asking is given a stroked 302W and a non-stroked 351W, is there any performance benefit of one over the other? In other words, will the 351 inherently make more torque or will the stroker? Are the power bands going to be different (given same setup)?

    I already have the 354 stroker from S.A. and am quite pleased with it, but I'm new to Ford small blocks and this was a question I've been pondering.

    Unique Motorcars 289 F.I.A. # 9142
    Southern Automotive 354 stroker

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Arlington, Texas, USA.
    Posts
    76
    I always hate questions that are answered with more questions, but I think you may have asked one here.

    The simple fact is that an engine that has a larger bore to stroke ratio should make rpm faster and should have a higher overall rpm rating, assuming the same quality components are used thoughout. An engine with a larger stroke to bore ratio (a 'stroker') should make more torque at a lower rpm, but will most likely not have the capability to run at the same rpm as an unstroked version.

    The 351 Windsor has a bore and stroke of 4.00 x 3.50. The 302 Windsor has a bore and stroke of 4.030 x 3.00. This means that the major difference between the 351W and the 302W is the stroke. If you stroke the 302W to 3.50, you will have an almost identical bore/stroke ratio to the 351W and, of course, an almost identical number of cubic inches. At this point, the major difference in performance will come down to what else you do to the engine. And, of course, this is where different heads, valves, cams, flywheels, carburators (dare I say Webers [:P]), fuel injection, ignition, timing, exhaust, etc, etc. all come into play. Sadly, it's just not as simple as saying this one is better than that one. There's just too many variables in the equation for a this/that answer.

    One solution might be to ask Bill at S.A. if he has a dyno chart on his 354 stroker kit and compare that to a dyno chart on a 351W. Of course, the dyno chart on a 351W is going to depend on which version of the 351W they dyno. There were significant differences in performance between "W", "H" and "R" versions, although they were all referred to as Windors.

    Too many variables...


    Ben
    Unique 427
    SA 427SO w/ Toploader
    Guardsman Blue w/ White Stripes

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Annapolis, MD, USA.
    Posts
    1,523
    Good answer Ben.

    Clay

    '98 Unique #9299, 427FE side oiler, top-loader (close), 3.31 rear

    Annapolis, MD

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •